Let me guess: you're running translation projects without formal glossaries or style guides. Maybe you've thought about creating them, but it always gets pushed to "when things slow down" (which never happens). Or maybe you think they're overkill for your operation.
Here's the uncomfortable truth: if you're not using glossaries and style guides, you're making your translators' jobs harder, your quality inconsistent, and your client retention worse.
Let's talk about why these aren't nice-to-haves; they're foundational to running a professional LSP.
Before we talk about why they matter, let's clarify what we're actually discussing.
A glossary is a documented list of terms and their approved translations. It tells translators exactly how specific words, phrases, product names, or technical terms should be translated in a given language pair. "User interface" → "interfaz de usuario" (not "interfaz del usuario" or any other variation).
A style guide is a document that defines how translation should sound and look. It covers tone (formal vs. casual), formatting preferences (dates, numbers, currencies), grammar decisions (Oxford comma or not), and brand voice. Think of it as your translation's personality guide.
Neither of these needs to be fancy. A well-organized spreadsheet works fine for a glossary. A simple Google Doc works for a style guide. The format matters way less than having them at all.
Let's be real about why people don't create these:
"We don't have time." Building glossaries and style guides feels like work that doesn't generate revenue. You've got projects to deliver right now. Documentation feels like a luxury.
"Our translators are experienced." You trust your team. They're professionals. They don't need hand-holding with detailed instructions.
"Every project is different." You work across industries and clients. Creating separate glossaries for everyone seems overwhelming.
"Clients don't provide this information." How are you supposed to create a glossary when the client hasn't given you one?
All of these reasons feel valid in the moment. They're also all costing you money and credibility.
Here's what actually happens when you skip glossaries and style guides:
Inconsistency across projects. Translator A uses one term. Translator B uses another. Both are technically correct, but now your client's documentation uses three different terms for the same concept. This makes them look unprofessional to their customers.
Inconsistency within projects. Even a single translator might use different terms throughout a long document if they don't have a reference. They translated "dashboard" as "tablero" on page 5 but "panel de control" on page 47. Nobody notices until the client complains.
Endless revision requests. "Can you change all instances of X to Y?" becomes a regular request because you didn't establish the preferred term upfront. Now you're doing unpaid revision work that could have been prevented.
Translator frustration. Your translators waste time making decisions that should have been made once, documented, and referenced. Every project becomes a guessing game instead of following clear guidelines.
Longer onboarding for new translators. When you need to bring in a new translator (which you will), they're starting from scratch. There's no institutional knowledge to pass on, so they repeat the same decision-making process.
Quality perception issues. Even if translations are technically accurate, inconsistency makes clients question your professionalism. They notice these things even if they don't speak the language, formatting inconsistencies, tone shifts, etc.
The irony? Creating glossaries and style guides upfront takes a few hours. Dealing with all these problems takes exponentially longer over time.
Some people argue that glossaries are only necessary for technical translation or highly specialized content. That's partially true; technical fields absolutely need them. But honestly, almost every project benefits.
Even if you're doing "simple" translation, having documented decisions prevents decision fatigue and ensures every translator approaches the work the same way.
Here's the thing: your first glossary doesn't need to be comprehensive. It needs to exist and be used.
Style guides can feel abstract, but they're incredibly practical when done right.
Define tone clearly. "Friendly but professional" is too vague. Give examples. Show what you mean. "Use 'you' instead of 'one' or 'the user.' Contractions are fine. Avoid jargon."
Address formatting decisions. How should dates be written? What about numbers? Currencies? Percentages? These seem minor until three translators format them three different ways.
Specify grammar preferences. Some grammar decisions are judgment calls. Document your client's preferences. "Use Oxford comma. Start list items with capital letters. Use sentence case for headings."
Include client-specific quirks. Every client has preferences. Some hate exclamation points. Some want em-dashes formatted with spaces. Some insist on specific capitalization for their product names. Document this stuff.
Provide examples of good translations. Instead of just rules, show translators what success looks like. Include excerpts of past translations that nailed the style.
Make it skimmable. Nobody wants to read a 50-page style guide before starting work. Use clear headers, bullet points, and examples. Translators should be able to find what they need in 30 seconds.
Here's a common scenario: you ask the client for a glossary or style guide, and they say they don't have one. Now what?
Here's what happens once you actually implement glossaries and style guides:
Glossaries and style guides aren't static documents. They evolve with your client's business.
After every project, review: Did new terms appear? Did the client request changes? Did translators have questions that should be addressed in documentation?
When clients rebrand or launch products, update immediately. New product names, new messaging, new tone, capture it all.
When translator questions repeat, that's a signal your documentation has a gap. If multiple translators ask the same thing, the answer belongs in your style guide.
At least annually, do a comprehensive review even if nothing obvious changed. Language evolves. Client preferences shift. Make sure your documentation stays current.
You don't need expensive software to manage glossaries and style guides, but the right tools make a massive difference.
Basic approach: Spreadsheets for glossaries, Google Docs for style guides. Free, accessible, searchable. This works fine for smaller operations.
Better approach: Translation management systems (TMS) that integrate glossaries into the translation environment. Translators see relevant terms as they work, not as a separate document to reference.
Best approach: Platforms designed for LSPs that combine project management, terminology management, and style guide access in one place. Tools like Awtomated let you build client-specific knowledge bases that stay attached to their projects automatically.
The technology matters less than the commitment to actually creating and using these resources. But as you scale, integrated systems save enormous amounts of time.
Glossaries and style guides feel like "nice to have" until you realize how much time, money, and credibility you're losing without them.
Every revision request that could have been prevented costs you money. Every inconsistency makes clients trust you less. Every hour translators spend guessing instead of referencing clear guidance is wasted productivity.
The LSPs that treat terminology and style management as core operations (not administrative overhead) are the ones delivering consistently excellent work, commanding premium rates, and keeping clients long-term.
So stop putting this off until "things slow down." Take one project this week and create a basic glossary. Next week, draft a simple style guide. The investment is a few hours. The return compounds forever.
Because professional LSPs don't just translate words. They build knowledge systems that ensure every translation maintains the quality and consistency their clients expect.
And that's the difference between being a commodity translation service and being a strategic partner clients can't imagine working without.